07-07-2017, 02:15 PM
pops in
to be honest??? i gotta agree with checkers. i've never seen the need for a second leader when instead of splitting the workload, it just makes everything a little bit difficult because you're constantly consulting them and they might not always be there to be consulted with, and then you gotta make decisions without them anyways and aaah it's just a mess!! this is coming from someone whose done this before. also idk if it's just but the fact that there's "shadowhunter" and then "vice-leader" just bothers me for some reason,, the ranks don't mesh well together in name or description. if we work together we can probably change it, but imo having a vice-leader takes so much from having an actual deputy that at this point you don't really need the rank?? vice leaders substitute for the leader. they hold raids, major authority, basically the right-hand-man in all but title. deputies seem to just sit there and look pretty when in reality they're supposed to be the ones to do all that stuff.
to be honest??? i gotta agree with checkers. i've never seen the need for a second leader when instead of splitting the workload, it just makes everything a little bit difficult because you're constantly consulting them and they might not always be there to be consulted with, and then you gotta make decisions without them anyways and aaah it's just a mess!! this is coming from someone whose done this before. also idk if it's just but the fact that there's "shadowhunter" and then "vice-leader" just bothers me for some reason,, the ranks don't mesh well together in name or description. if we work together we can probably change it, but imo having a vice-leader takes so much from having an actual deputy that at this point you don't really need the rank?? vice leaders substitute for the leader. they hold raids, major authority, basically the right-hand-man in all but title. deputies seem to just sit there and look pretty when in reality they're supposed to be the ones to do all that stuff.